What Novels can do that Film's can't.
By Seymour Chatman pp.445-460
In our everyday lives stories are all around us. We could be reading them on a newspaper, going to see a play in the theatre or studying a painting in a gallery to try and solve the story. It is one fundamental way we communicate to each other.
So a narrative can be termed usually to mean a story or a chain of events that are delivered to us through various mediums. These mediums have properties common to them, for instance their narrative combines the time patterns of plot events. These two structures are the actual 'story time ' with the 'discourse time’, which can be completely different to temporal reality. As we know these structures are universal to all mediums so this enables a narrative to be adapted easily from one medium to another.
In this piece of Literature the author chooses to focus on the differences in the same narrative through the study of film and novel.
Firstly we look at the way description is used to set the scene of a novel. Novels rely on text to communicate the story. The viewer needs to encapsulate the images in their imagination for the story to unfold; therefore the description is paramount for successful visualization of the text.
In film we see a different approach. It relies on movement and lens events i.e. close-ups to communicate a visual language. The point of view is another feature. It may portray events through the eyes of the actor giving us an insight to what they are thinking.
Whatever medium it is, each finds its own individual way through its properties to tickle on the senses of the viewer as to what the narrative is trying to achieve.
From concepts in Film Theory, Dudley Andrew
Adaptation pp 461-469
As the first piece just touched on it, we see here a deeper look at the concept or process of translating a text from one medium to another. To what style and extent is the question as potentially the adaptation could be as abstract as the creator wishes. The Author looks at three modes of adaptation, borrowing, intersection and fidelity of Transformation.
While borrowing been the most popular, I find the fidelity and Transformation the most challenging. Here the mood, tone or overall feeling of the text needs to be re-created successfully in another language.
Theorists believe this is possible because of the narrative. As previously mentioned the narrative is the link between medias such as the novel and cinema.
We see here how these adaptations are paramount to the history of film. They adapted and evolved to take on the style in fashion of that particular cinematic era.
Anne Friedberg
The End of Cinema; Multimedia and technological change.
It seems this topic is most under scrutiny by commentators and theorists alike. We have read a lot of different articles including this one in our Film in a digital age module.
It is apparent that film is been or has been superseded by this digital age. Cinema s time is on a bumpy ride of transition. We see from this article how VCR, cable television and the remote control marked the change in the cinematic experience. It allowed the viewer to view what they want when they want.
Computer screens and the Internet have now taking hold on those technologies with its interactivity. It is coming more increasingly obvious that these changes are happening at a rapid rate and not only does the concept of ‘Film history’ need to be re-invented, this also marks a chance to collaborate these new technologies with a 100 years of moving image to bring it through to the current ways of seeing.